Here is a new homework problem that will take you through the analysis that John Wikswo and I published in our paper “The Magnetic Field of a Single Axon” (Biophysical Journal, Volume 48, Pages 93–109, 1985). Not only does it answer the question about induction, but also it provides practice in back-of-the-envelope estimation. To learn more about biomagnetism and magnetic induction, see Chapter 8 of Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology.
Section 8.6
Problem 29½. Consider an action potential propagating down a nerve axon. An electric field E, having a rise time T and extended over a length L, is associated with the upstroke of the action potential.
(a) Use Ohm’s law to relate E to the current density J and the electrical conductivity σ.
(b) Use Ampere’s law (Eq. 8.24, but ignore the displacement current) to estimate the magnetic field B from J and the permeability of free space, μ0. To estimate the derivative, replace the curl operator with 1/L.
(c) Use Faraday’s law (Eq. 8.22, ignoring the minus sign) to estimate the induced electric field E* from B. Replace the time derivative by 1/T.
(d) Write your result as the dimensionless ratio E*/E.
(e) Use σ = 0.1 S/m, μ0 = 4 π × 10-7 T m/A, L = 10 mm, and T = 1 ms, to calculate E*/E.
(f) Check that the units in your calculation in part (e) are consistent with E*/E being dimensionless.
(g) Draw a picture of the axon showing E, J, B, E*, and L.
(h) What does your result in part (e) imply about the need to consider inductance when analyzing action potential propagation along a nerve axon.
For those of you who don’t have IPMB handy, Equation 8.24 (Ampere’s law, ignoring the displacement current) is
∇×B = μ0 J
and Eq. 8.22 (Faraday’s law) is
∇×E = −∂B/∂t .
I’ll leave it to you to solve this problem. However, I’ll show you my picture for part (g).
Also, for part (e) I get a small value, on the order of ten parts per billion (10-8). The induction of a nerve axon is negligible. We don't need an inductor when modeling a nerve axon.
No comments:
Post a Comment