“We saw in Chap. 4 (Stokes' law) that the translational viscous drag on a spherical particle is 6Let’s calculate this torque. We always learn something when we see where such a result comes from.πηav. Similarly, the viscous torque on a rotating sphere is 8πηa^{3}(dθ/dt).”

To begin, we will redo Homework Problem 46 from Chapter 1 that asks you to calculate the translational Stokes' law by considering a stationary sphere in a moving viscous fluid (equivalent to a sphere moving through a stationary viscous fluid). Below is the analogous problem for a sphere rotating in the same fluid.

Problem 46 ½. Consider a sphere of radiusarotating with angular velocityωin a fluid of viscosityη. For low Reynolds number flow, the fluid velocity and pressure surrounding the sphere are

v=_{φ}ωa^{3}sinθ/r^{2}

v=_{r}v=_{θ}p= 0.

(a) Show that the no-slip boundary condition is satisfied.

(b) Integrate the shear torque over the sphere surface and find an expression for the net viscous torque on the sphere.When I first tried to solve part (b), I kept getting an answer that was off by a factor of 2/3. I checked my work several times, but I couldn’t find any mistake. After much fussing, I finally figured out my error. For the shear stress at the sphere surface, I was using

*η*d

*v*/d

_{φ}*r*. This seemed right at first, but it’s not. The shear stress is actually

*η*(d

*v*/d

_{φ}*r*–

*v*/

_{φ}*r*). Why? I could just say that I looked up the expression for the shear strain

*ε*for spherical coordinates and found it had two terms. But that’s no fair (and no fun). We have to understand what we are doing, not just look things up. Why does the expression for the shear stress have two terms?

_{rφ}Let’s start on page 16 of IPMB, where Russ and I note that the shear stress is the viscosity times the rate of change of the shear strain. We need to see how the shear strain changes with time. There are two cases.

1. The first case will give us the familiar dv/drexpression for the shear stress. Consider an element of fluid with thickness dr, as shown below.

The velocity is in theThis is where I got stuck, until I realized there is a second case we must consider.φdirection, and depends onr. In timeT, the top surface of the box moves to the right a distancev(_{φ}r+dr)T, while the bottom surface moves onlyv(_{φ}r)T, forming the dashed box in the figure. The shear strain is the angleθ(see Problem 14 in Chapter 1). Consider the shaded triangle having height drand angleθ. The length of the bottom side of the triangle isv(_{φ}r+dr)T–v(_{φ}r)T. The tangent ofθis therefore

tanθ= (v(_{φ}r+dr)T–v(_{φ}r)T) / dr .

In the limit as drgoes to zero, and for small angles such that tanθis approximatelyθ, the shear strain becomes dv/d_{φ}rT. Therefore, the rate of change of the shear strain is dv/d_{φ}r, and the contribution to the shear stress isηdv/d_{φ}r.

2. Even ifvdoes not change with_{φ}r, we can still get a shear strain because of the curvilinear coordinates. Consider the arc-shaped element of fluid shown below.

Suppose the fluid moves with the same speed,In general, both of these effects act together, so the shear stress isv, on both the top and bottom surfaces. After time_{φ}T, the fluid element moves to the right and forms the dashed element. The problem is, this dashed shape is no longer an arc aligned with the curvilinear coordinates. It has been sheared! Consider the shaded triangle with angleθ. The top side has a length (r+dr)θ–v_{φ}T, and the right side has length dr. The ratio of these two sides is tanθ, or for small angles justθ. So

θ= [(r+dr)θ–v_{φ}T]/dr

Solving forθgives

θ=(v/_{φ}r)T,

so the shear stress isηv/_{φ}r.

Notice that in the first case the top side is sheared to the right, whereas in the second case it is sheared to the left. We need a minus sign in case two.

*η*(d

*v*/d

_{φ}*r*–

*v*/

_{φ}*r*).

For a velocity that falls as 1/

*r*

^{2}, the d

*v*/d

_{φ}*r*term gives -2/

*r*

^{3}, while the

*-v*/

_{φ}*r*term gives -1/

*r*

^{3}, with a sum of -3/

*r*

^{3}. I was getting a factor of two when I was supposed to get a factor of three.

Are you still not convinced about the second term in the stress? Look at it this way. Suppose the velocity were proportional to

*r.*This would imply that the fluid was rotating as if it were a solid body (all the fluid would have the same angular velocity). Such a pure rotation should not result in shear. If we only include the d

*v*/d

_{φ}*r*term, we would still predict a shear stress. But if we include both terms they cancel, implying no stress.

Let me outline how you do the integral in part (b) of the homework problem above. The torque is the force times distance. The distance from the axis of rotation to the surface where the shear acts (the moment arm) is

*a*sin

*θ*. The force is the shear stress times the area, and the area element is

*a*

^{2}sin

*θ*d

*θ*d

*φ*. You end up getting three factors of sin

*θ*: one from the moment arm, one from the shear stress, and one from the area element, so you have to integrate sin

^{3}

*θ.*

If you want, you can add a third part to Homework Problem 35 in Chapter 1:

(c) Show that the velocity distribution in Problem 46 ½ is incompressible by verifying that the divergence of the velocity is zero.Appendix L will help you calculate the divergence in spherical coordinates.

Finally, how did I get the velocity distribution

*v*=

_{φ}*ω*

*a*

^{3}sin

*θ*/

*r*

^{2}that appeared in the homework problem? When the pressure is zero, the velocity during low Reynolds number flow, known as Stokes flow, obeys ∇

^{2}

**v**= 0. This is a complicated equation to solve, because

**v**is a vector. In Cartesian coordinates, the Laplacian of a vector is just the Laplacian of its components. In curvilinear coordinates, however, the

*r*,

*θ*, and

*φ*components of the vector mix together in a complicated mess. I will let you try to sort that all out. Don't say I didn't warn you.

This is what makes you such a good teacher. Your approach to the problem - you speak to your audience and invite them to join in the thought process of problem solving. The best way to teach is to walk along side the student.

ReplyDelete