“We may wish to know the probability that particles…are scattered in a certain direction. We have to consider the probability that they are scattered into a small solid angle dPerhaps the most famous differential cross section is the Rutherford scattering formula. Ernest Rutherford (who I have discussed before in this blog) derived this formula to explain the results of his alpha particle scattering experiments, in which he fired alpha particles at a thin metal foil and determined the angle of scattering by observing the light produced when a scattered particle hit a zinc sulfide screen. His formula assumes a non-relativistic alpha particle scatters off a massive (no recoil), spinless, bare, positively charged target nucleus. Below is a new homework problem providing some practice with the Rutherford formulaΩ. In this case,σis called the differential scattering cross section and is often written as

The units of the differential scattering cross section are m^{2}sr^{-1}. The differential cross section depends onθ, the angle between the directions of travel of the incident and scattered particles.”

Problem 16 ½. An example of a differential cross section is the Rutherford scattering formula

(a) Plot dσ/dΩversusθover the range 0 toπ.

(b) Repeat part (a) using semilog graph paper.

(c) The constantAis equal to

whereqandQare the charges of the alpha particle and nucleus, andEis the alpha particle energy. Show thatAhas the units of m^{2}sr^{-1}. Hint: steradians, like radians, are dimensionless (see Appendix A).

(d) Interpret what happens physically whenθisπ. What is the value of the cosecant of π/2? WriteAin terms of the distance of closest approach of an alpha particle to the nucleus. Hint: see Chapter 17, Problem 2.

(e) Note that dσ/dΩgoes to infinity asθgoes to zero. Interpret this result physically. What assumption did Rutherford make that may be responsible for this unphysical behavior?

(f) Integrate dHere is the history of the Rutherford scattering experiment, as told by Richard Rhodes in The Making of the Atomic Bomb.σ/dΩoverθfrom 0 toπ. You may need to use a good table of integrals. Explain your result (which may surprise you) physically.

“[Hans] Geiger [Rutherford’s assistant] went to work on alpha scattering, aided by Ernest Marsden, then an eighteen-year-old Manchester undergraduate. They observed alpha particles coming out of a firing tube and passing through foils of such metals as aluminum, silver, gold, and platinum. The results were generally consistent with expectation: alpha particles might very well accumulate as much as two degrees of total deflection bouncing around among atoms of the plum-pudding sort [an early model of atomic structure proposed by J. J. Thomson]. But the experiment was troubled with stray particles. Geiger and Marsden thought molecules in the walls of the firing tube might be scattering them. They tried eliminating the strays by narrowing and defining the end of the firing tube with a series of graduated metal washers. That proved no help.

Rutherford wandered into the room. The three men talked over the problem. Something about it alerted Rutherford’s intuition for promising side effects. Almost as an afterthought he turned to Marsden and said, ‘See if you can get some effect of alpha particles directly reflected from a metal surface.’ Marsden knew that a negative result was expected—alpha particles shot through thin foils, they did not bounce back form them—but that missing a positive result would be an unforgivable sin. He took great care to prepare a strong alpha source. He aimed the pencil-narrow beam of alphas at a forty-five degree angle onto a sheet of gold foil. He positioned his scintillation screen on the same side of the foil, beside the alpha beam, so that a particle bouncing back would strike the screen and register as a scintillation. Between firing tube and screen he interposed a thick lead plate so no direct alpha particles could interfere.

Immediately, and to his surprise, he found what he was looking for. ‘I remember well reporting the result to Rutherford,’ he wrote, ‘…when I met him on the steps leading to his private room, and the joy with which I told him….

Rutherford had been genuinely astonished by Marsden’s results. ‘It was quite the most incredible event that has ever happened to me in my life,’ he said later. ‘It was almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you. On consideration I realized that this scattering backwards must be the result of a single collision, and when I made calculations I saw that it was impossible to get anything of that order of magnitude unless you took a system in which the greatest part of the mass of the atom was concentrated in a minute nucleus.’”

## No comments:

## Post a Comment